This shows that, contrary to what many people think, morality isn’t innate. For example, in a sociocentric society, it might be morally wrong to move away from your family to pursue a promotion, whereas this is expected in an individualistic society. Individualistic and sociocentric societies make different moral judgments. However, most societies subordinate the needs of the individual to the needs of the group-they are sociocentric. In individualistic societies, the role of society is to serve the individual. The individualistic society, in which Westerners live now, is a product of the relatively recent Enlightenment.
For example, Westerners are unique in their prioritization of individual rights over the common good. One of the most common answers is that morality is innate.
The question of where morality comes from has plagued scholars for centuries. To understand why morality is primarily intuitive, we first need to understand how morality evolved. Principle #1: Morality Is More Intuitive Than Rational Morality’s Origins Morality is about more than fairness and harm.Morality is more intuitive than rational.The Righteous Mind builds this argument on three basic principles: Consequently, liberals and conservatives lack a common language, and reason-based arguments about morality are ineffective. He argues that moral judgments are emotional, not logical-they are based on stories rather than reason. In The Righteous Mind, moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt explains why liberals, conservatives, and libertarians all have different understandings of right and wrong. 1-Page Summary 1-Page Book Summary of The Righteous Mind
0 kommentar(er)
